Articles

Articles

The Simple In Proverbs

The Simple in Proverbs

Derek Kidner points out that there are three different classes of 'fools' in Proverbs: the simpleton, the fool, and the scoffer. They all have one common trait: they refuse instruction and advice.

The simpleton is not UNable to learn, but is naive concerning the danger of facing life without wisdom & discernment. In fact, the NASB normally translates this a 'naive'. Such is summarized: "The naive believes everything, But the sensible man considers his steps." (14:15). Twice we read: "The prudent sees the evil and hides himself, But the naive go on, and are punished for it" (22:3; 27:12). See the extended story of the simple one who is seduced in chapter 7!

The instructions in the Proverbs were designed to give such simpletons prudence, knowledge, and discretion (1:4). Wisdom calls for the simple to leave their naive ways and come learn (9:4-6). Some will, but others will refuse such instruction and progress on the road to destruction of fools. Some, upon seeing where their naive ways lead, will learn: "When the scoffer is punished, the naive becomes wise; But when the wise is instructed, he receives knowledge" (21:11).

Such chosen naivety is not restricted to the young! A constant problem among men is thinking that there are no consequences to their naive choices. Eat drink, and be merry ... but in the end, such brings to ruin and trouble. With the giving of the law God said: "‘Oh that they had such a heart in them, that they would fear Me and keep all My commandments always, that it may be well with them and with their sons forever!" (Deut. 5:29). Many years later, God states: "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge. Because you have rejected knowledge, I also will reject you from being My priest. Since you have forgotten the law of your God, I also will forget your children." (Hosea 4:6).

Thus the NT instructs: "So then do not be foolish, but understand what the will of the Lord is" (Eph. 5:17). Are you listening, or are you being a simpleton?  Hugh DeLong